There has been a certain amount of attention focused on Alberta's Chief Electoral Officer and his comments regarding his philosophy towards his newly re-inherited position. Brian Fjeldheim, who held the position from 1998 to 2005, was recently reappointed following the dismissal of his more activist successor-turned-predecessor Lorne Gibson. After re-assuming his role last week, Mr. Fjeldheim was a little more reserved when describing his role in advocating the importance of the vote to Albertans (60% of Albertans did not vote in the 2008 election). Dave Breakenridge offered some thoughts on Mr. Fjeldhiem's comments in today's Calgary Sun.
Open up the Elections Act.
In the next few weeks, Justice Minister Alison Redford is expected to introduce legislative amendments to Alberta's aging Elections Act. Minister Redford has said that the amendments will include some of the 182 recommended changes submitted by Mr. Gibson before his departure (but will not include fixed election dates). Of course, the recommendations included in the Bill will have be carefully chosen and measured for political impact by Minister Redford and her PC cabinet colleagues. Minister Redford's amendments will likely include changes to how Returning Officers are chosen. During the 2008 election, it was revealed that the PC Party had provided lists of candidates for Returning Officers to the Elections Office (over half of the appointed Returning Officers had partisan connections to the PC Party).
Elections procedures can be improved through legislation, but democratic participation can be strengthened through meaningful engagement. In September 2007, the Government of New Zealand tried something completely different. As an innovative way to capture the views of the public on what a new Policing Act should look like, the Ministry of Justice launched an online Wiki. This Wiki allowed citizens from across that country to contribute their ideas and collaborate in the creation of new legislation.
What better way to reinvigorate our Elections Act than by opening up the amendment process to allow Albertans to collaborate by contributing their ideas for changes and improvements? What better opportunity to do things differently in than by allowing Albertans to invest their own ideas into the development of the important piece of legislation that will decide how their elections are structured? Is there a more meaningful piece of legislation that could be opened up to public collaboration than the Elections Act? Would this kind of online collaboration succeed in Alberta? There is only one way to find out.
Prior to entering elected office in 2008, Minister Redford cultivated an international legal career helping build democracies in countries around the globe (including as one of four international election commissioners appointed by the Secretary General of the United Nations to administer Afghanistan's first parliamentary elections in September 2005). Legislative amendments can improve structure, but opening up the Elections Act to real public collaboration could be Minister Redford's big opportunity to create more meaningful democratic participation in Alberta.
Making it easier for students to vote.
I am sure that there would be no shortage of Albertans who would contribute their ideas to an open dialogue on improving our Elections Act. The Council of Alberta University Students submitted a handful of recommendations (pdf) to Minister Redford last year when they heard about the upcoming legislative amendments. Each of the five recommendations have been adopted by Elections officials in provinces across Canada (though no jurisdiction has adopted all five). The recommendations would improve access to a voting demographic that due to its geographic transience, are likely to face barriers and challenges to participating in elections.
Coming Soon: New Maps.
Alberta's Electoral Boundaries Commission is due to release its interim report by February 26, 2010.
Increase opportunities for young Albertans to vote? Are you insane? The next thing you know they'd all go out and vote for the wrong party! The idea - seriously folks - is to suppress the vote while getting your loyalists out. It's the strategy of the American Republicans, and its the strategy of both the federal and provincial branches of the American Party of Canada.
ReplyDeleteWhy doesn't the government setup a meaningfully engaging word cloud wiki and provide word cloud hansard after every days session.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to imply that decreasing barriers for younger voters will increase younger voter turnout.
ReplyDeleteIs there data to support this? Based on the chart, is it evident that BC has a higher portion of younger voters casting ballots?
That's some excellent paradigm shifting, TLBP! We should have a dialogue about it!
ReplyDeleteIs there data from the New Zealand wiki experience showing whether the feedback and input was diverse and from a large sample or is it just a different elitist group forming policy?
ReplyDeleteAs the disarming Tom Flanagan, who organized Harper's campaign in 2004and is one of the key people behind Danielle Smith, said at a recent conference that I attended: 'If young people were voting, they'd probably be voting NDP and Green. So we're happy that they don't.'
ReplyDeleteWe'll see if Alison Redford thinks any differently and if she can convince her premier that encouraging more people to vote is a worthwhile objective.
Alvin Finkel