During the 2008 provincial election, the impartiality of Alberta's electoral process came into question when it was discovered that half of the local Returning Officers had strong links to the governing Progressive Conservatives. Then-Liberal Leader Taft called for a complete review of how elections in Alberta are organized.
After the 2008 election, Chief Electoral Officer Lorne Gibson submitted a long list of recommendations to the Legislative Assembly to change how elections are organized by giving more authority to the an independent elections office. Shortly afterward, Gibson's contract was not renewed by a PC MLA dominated committee. Not surprisingly, Taft once again tackled the issue during Question Period in that Legislative sitting.
In 2009, another partisan appointment was made during the Calgary-Glenmore by-election. Premier Stelmach later said that he had no problem with the Elections Office appointing officers, though no legislative changes have been made to reflect the statement. Earlier this month, former Chief Electoral Officer Brian Fjeldheim was re-appointed to the position (he served in the position previous to Gibson from 1998 to 2005).
I do not believe that improvements to Elections Alberta organization would have changed the outcome of the last election or even increased the voter turnout higher than 40%, but that is not the point. The integrity of our representative government is based on the strength of our democracy, a large part of which is expressed in our elections process.
What's the problem with Fjeldheim coming back? He did it before, there weren't any problems that I can see. He's got experience, why not? Stop being so partisan and disagreeing with what the Tories do just because they're Tories.
ReplyDeleteWhat did I say about Fjeldheim? He was re-appointed.
ReplyDeleteI've always wondered why Kevin Taft is the spokesperson still for so many of the opposition issues forwarded by the Liberals.
ReplyDeleteThe Liberals would do so much better with an interesting, compelling and/or attractive leader who people want to listen to. So when they make valid political opposition, which this is, we care to listen and give them points for trying, instead of having to block out the shrill, pedantic noise that is Taft.
Does anyone have any "know" as to why Gibson was not renewed?
ReplyDeleteThe Tories will work every advantage they can, from appointing loyal elections staff to refusing progressive reforms of riding boundaries. Each issue on its own may not be 'corrupt' but the pattern is there if one cares to look...
ReplyDeleteIt is a pity that Taft is weak and that the Liberals are, well, called Liberals. A centrist party with a strong and connected leader (Bronconnier? Boutilier?) would make for an interesting election next time around.
amz
Chris Labossiere wants an "attractive" Liberal leader? That's the only attribute necessary for a good leader? Talk about narrow minded and downright prejudiced.
ReplyDeleteChris: perhaps the Liberals didn't want to put their leader out front on this issue because they expected that it would be spun as "sour grapes" by the other side. Better to let Taft bring this forward to keep Swann out of the ensuing fray, and take advantage of Taft's special connection with this issue as the leader at the time of the last election.
ReplyDeleteWould that explanation work for you?